iklan banner
iklan banner
Half of Canadians can’t name a woman scientist or engineer, poll finds | CBC News

Half of Canadians can’t name a woman scientist or engineer, poll finds | CBC News

Author : Published:

You’ve probably heard of Stephen Hawking, Albert Einstein and Mark Zuckerberg.

But can you name a woman scientist or engineer? Half of Canadians can’t, suggests a new poll.

The online survey of 1,511 Canadians was commissioned by the non-profit group Girls Who Code and conducted by the market research firm Maru/Blue from March 1-3 and released for International Women’s Day today.

It was intended to collect data about how people felt about science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) careers and education in Canada, said Reshma Saujani, founder and CEO of the group, which aims to close the gender gap in technology by teaching girls coding skills.

“Role models matter,” Saujani said. “When you don’t see these representations on television, in media, you start to think ‘Well, maybe this isn’t for me’…It really changes who think we can be and what we think we can pursue.”

The poll found:

  • When asked how many women scientists/engineers they could name, 52 per cent of respondents said “none.”

  • When asked to picture a computer scientist, 82 per cent of respondents immediately imagined a man rather than a woman.

  • 77 per cent of respondents think increased media representation of women in STEM careers or leadership roles would help close the gender gap in STEM.

The organization noted that a 2017 report by the business consulting firm McKinsey found women made up 47 per cent of the Canadian workforce, but only 23 per cent of the STEM workforce.

Saujani said that’s a problem in a society that’s being transformed by automation through technology.

“We need to make sure that half our labour force is included in that innovation and in that growth,” she said.

She added that including women makes a difference to the development of products affecting everyone. She gave the example of Google auto-correcting “she” to “he” in a note between her and a colleague, assuming the editor they were talking about was male — something she suggests might not happen with a more diverse technology workforce.

“That’s a small thing, but a really big thing,” she said.

Saujani acknowledges that the poll didn’t ask how many male scientists or engineers they could name, but thinks the answer would “probably” be different.

“Bill Gates is computer scientist, Mark Zuckerberg is a computer scientist,” she said. 

Editing women in

Sandra Corbeil, who’s involved a Women in STEM initiative at Ingenium, the organization that oversees Canada’s national museums of science and innovation, agrees that women scientists are under-recognized.

“We know that women aren’t well represented in STEM, but when it comes to telling their stories, they’re even less represented,” said Corbeil, the group’s director of strategic partnerships and networks. If we’re not sharing women’s contributions to science and technology, she added, we’re not letting the next generation know “that this is a space that people like them are succeeding in, have contributions to make, and maybe not inspiring [them].”

Ingenium organized an event where volunteers from the public collaborated to add more women scientists to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia for the International Day of Women and Girls in Science this past February. (Ingenium)

That’s one reason Ingenium organized an event where volunteers from the public collaborated to add more women scientists to the online encyclopedia Wikipedia for the International Day of Women and Girls in Science this past February.

The 21 participants added four articles, including Dr. Anna Marion Hilliard, who developed a simple pap test for early detection of cervical cancer and Marla Sokolowski, who discovered an important gene that affects both metabolism and behaviour in fruit flies. The volunteer editors also updated and translated several other entries.

Similar events have been held around the world to boost the representation of women on Wikipedia, where as of March 4, 2019, only 17.7 per cent of biographies were of women — even 2018’s winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics, Donna Strickland, didn’t have a Wikipedia entry until the prize was announced.

Science superstars?

Corbeil acknowledged that in science, the individual contributions of scientists, whether they are men or women, tend to not be well known by the public.

“We don’t treat them like superstars … to me, it’s something that we probably should change because their contributions matter.”

Ingenium faced its own controversy about the recognition of women scientists in 2015, when two female members of a selection committee for its Canadian Science and Engineering Hall of Fame quit over the fact that no women had been nominated for induction two years in a row. The program has since been discontinued.

One of the two who resigned was Judy Illes, a University of British Columbia scientist who holds a Canada Research Chair in Neuroethics.

She said the nominations weren’t reflecting women’s increasing contributions to science and engineering.

“It wasn’t keeping apace and we weren’t doing enough to make that happen. It’s frustrating,” recalled Illes, who continues to push for gender equity in science.

She added that she thinks recognizing greatness is important. “I believe those recognitions are invaluable in incentivizing everyone who works hard and seeks to achieve a goal in mind that has impact and an influence on a broader scale.”

For International Women’s Day, Illes is co-organizing an event with consulates in five other countries to develop policies that can be applied internationally to address challenges that women in health, science and innovation still face. For example, she said, those could include ways to destigmatize time away from work to have children and better social programs to support couples where both members work.

“A number of studies that show that when women are well integrated into board meetings, academia, engineering, that diversity of perspective, creativity, talent, inherent skill really brings greater richness to both the development and products of that workplace,” Illes added.

She does think the recognition of women scientists has improved in recent years, with more of them winning awards such as research chairs and Orders of Canada.

“We’re making tremendous progress, but there’s more work to be done for sure.”

Read More



from Update Trend News https://ift.tt/2HdJECb
0 Comments